Woman in Gray Blazer Holding Pen Having Meeting with Her Colleagues
Categories

Law

Bad LSAT Score? How to Recover, Retake, and Still Get Into Law School

August 21 2025 By The MBA Exchange
Select viewing preference
Light
Dark

Understanding the LSAT’s Role in Law School Admissions

What the LSAT Is

The Law School Admission Test (LSAT) is the gatekeeper of legal education—a standardized, half-day exam designed to test the exact skills you’ll need in law school: logical precision, analytical dexterity, and dense-text stamina. Developed in 1948, it’s administered by the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) and remains a cornerstone of the admissions process at nearly every ABA-accredited school.

The test includes four scored sections: Logical Reasoning (the “argue like a lawyer” section), Analytical Reasoning (a.k.a. Logic Games—soon to be phased out), and Reading Comprehension (dense, high-stakes text dissection). There’s also one unscored experimental section, and a separately administered Writing Sample. The scoring scale runs from 120 to 180, with 151 as the historical median. Competitive applicants? Think 165+. T14 material? You’re looking at 170+ territory.

Why It’s Critical

Your LSAT doesn’t just open the door—it determines how wide that door swings. Law schools often weight the LSAT as much as or more than GPA in admissions calculations. It’s also the single most decisive factor for merit-based scholarships. Land a 172? You’re not just a strong applicant—you’re a budget-friendly one.

Admissions officers—many of whom have told us this off-record—see LSAT scores as a strong predictor of bar passage. A high score telegraphs to the committee: this applicant can survive, and thrive.

Setting the Stakes

At schools like Columbia, Michigan, and NYU, we’ve seen firsthand how a single LSAT point—yes, one—can make the difference between waitlist purgatory and acceptance with a scholarship. One of the most common missteps? Assuming a “pretty good” 160 will play well across the board. In today’s hyper-competitive cycle, pretty good often lands you nowhere.

Diagnosing Your Current Score and Setting a Realistic Target

A 165 places you around the 89th percentile nationally. That’s a score most test-takers would frame and hang above their desk. But law schools? They see it differently. At T14 institutions, a 165 is solid—admirable, even—but far from a lock. It might earn you a second look at Georgetown; it won’t turn heads at Columbia.

More importantly, a 165 often reflects uneven performance. Maybe you crushed Logical Reasoning but stumbled through a logic game. Or maybe Reading Comprehension went sideways. That’s the story your score tells—if you know how to read it.

What Makes a 173 Different

Now we’re talking 99th percentile. At this level, you’re not just good—you’re near flawless. The difference isn’t just eight points. It’s precision. Consistency. Margin for error. A 173 often means you nailed 95%+ of the test. That kind of buffer allows for a flubbed question or two without damage. A 165? One section gone wrong can tank your shot at the score you need.

And here’s the kicker: the LSAT has a ceiling effect. The higher your score, the harder it gets to climb. Improving from 150 to 160 might take 6–8 weeks. Going from 165 to 173? That’s a campaign.

Diagnostic Framework

Start with a full-length, proctored practice exam under timed, no-pause conditions. No snack breaks. No texting your study group. Just four sections, back to back, like the real thing.

Then break it down. Use analytics tools (LSAC’s LawHub, 7Sage, etc.) to pinpoint where you’re leaking points. Are you missing inference questions? Struggling with grouping games? That’s the level of granularity required.

One major pitfall: chasing the total score while ignoring section-level mastery. Schools care about your composite, yes—but mastering each section is the only way to ensure you hit it again when it counts.

Constructing a Customized LSAT Training Plan

There are four primary LSAT prep formats, each with its own use case—and failure mode.

  • Prep books (Powerscore, LSAT Trainer): Ideal for self-motivated learners who want full control. But be warned: they offer zero accountability.
  • Online courses (Khan Academy, 7Sage, LSAT Lab): Flexible and affordable. Solid for building foundational skills—but easy to coast through.
  • In-person classes (Kaplan, Princeton Review): Structured, but often rigid. You’re stuck with the pace and quality of the cohort.
  • Tutoring: High-impact, high-cost. Best when you’re targeting elite scores or stuck in a score plateau.

Choose your weapon based on how you learn—not how your friend aced it. Visual learners often thrive with video-heavy platforms. Detail-oriented types might prefer textbook rigor. If you’re juggling work or school, asynchronous formats win. If you need deadlines and human interaction to stay accountable, tutoring or a live class may be the difference between consistency and chaos.

The Case for Professional Support

If you’re aiming for 170+, every point counts—and self-study might not cut it. Experienced LSAT tutors spot your blind spots faster than any analytics dashboard. They’ll refine your logic, identify pattern weaknesses, and optimize your test-day performance.

Programs like Blueprint and Manhattan Prep offer structured, comprehensive curriculums with built-in diagnostics and adaptive scheduling tools. That said, fit trumps brand. We’ve seen students plateau in prestige programs simply because the pacing or pedagogy didn’t match their needs.

Scheduling and Study Planning

Design a schedule that builds momentum—not burnout. Start by anchoring your calendar to your official LSAT test date. Then reverse-engineer from there:

  • Weeks 1–4: Concept building. Daily drills and review.
  • Weeks 5–8: Mixed practice. Introduce timing. Simulate stress.
  • Weeks 9–12+: Full-length tests, every weekend. Post-mortems after each.

Each week should include:

  • 3–4 hours of untimed review and error analysis
  • 2–3 timed sections or mini-tests
  • 1 full-length practice exam (starting mid-cycle)

Milestones to Hit

By week 4, you should see section-level consistency—e.g., under 5 wrong per Logical Reasoning section.

By week 8, stamina and timing should improve. Scoring range should stabilize within 3 points.

By week 12+, you’re looking for reproducibility. If you can hit your target score two out of three times, you’re ready.

If not? Pivot. Escalate to tutoring. Fix what’s broken. The LSAT doesn’t reward stubbornness—it rewards precision and adaptation.

Mastering Each Section: Advanced Strategies for High Scorers

If you’re sitting at a 165, you’re already competent. But competence isn’t enough. Most 165 scorers still fall for classic traps—especially stimulus-based misreads and attractive-but-wrong answer choices.

The fix? Stop reacting and start anticipating. Elite scorers internalize argument structures so well they’re predicting conclusions before the question even loads. You should be prephrasing—consciously forming a mental model of the correct answer—before looking at the choices. It’s not a parlor trick. It’s a muscle built through repetition, and it separates those who hover at 165 from those who surge past 170.

Analytical Reasoning (Logic Games)

This is where most top scorers create separation—because Logic Games are, paradoxically, the most learnable section. If you’re still diagramming every rule manually or hesitating during game setup, you’re leaving points on the table.

You should know the major game types cold: sequencing, grouping, hybrids. Blind review is essential—redo games without looking at your prior work to force automation. The goal is foolproofing: complete mastery over every common game type so that you can execute setups and deductions on autopilot. Elite scorers don’t “solve” games—they run them like code.

Reading Comprehension

This is the graveyard of the 170 chase. It’s the least studied and most resisted section—because it feels like you either “get it” or you don’t. But that’s a myth. The reality? RC is about stamina and retention, not raw intellect.

Ditch elaborate annotation. They slow you down and clutter the margin. Instead, train your brain to mentally summarize each paragraph in 5–7 words. That anchors the structure and helps you re-locate key information fast. Do 4–5 RC sections in a row to simulate fatigue. That’s when careless errors creep in—and when top scorers get their edge.

Timed Strategy and Mental Game

Hitting a 173+ isn’t just about knowing the content—it’s about handling the pressure. Simulate test-day pacing religiously: 35-minute sections, no pausing, no re-do’s. Build your internal metronome so well that your pacing survives fatigue, panic, or a rogue fire alarm.

Decision-making should be reflexive. You don’t “try out” answer choices—you know which ones to dismiss before you finish reading them. This is the kind of sharpness that only comes from hundreds of reps.

Finally, get honest about mental game. Performance plateaus often mask anxiety, burnout, or overtraining. Build recovery time into your plan. Meditate. Run. Breathe. The LSAT rewards cold-blooded clarity—and that’s as much about mindset as mechanics.

Practice Like It’s Test Day: Simulation, Review, and Refinement

Practicing like a champion means training like it’s already game day. That means full-length, official LSATs—under strict, test-day conditions. No pauses. No second chances. No coffee refills between sections.

Aim for 8–12 full tests across your prep window. Start light, ramp up intensity by mid-cycle, then taper the last two weeks to preserve energy and sharpen focus. And yes—use real LSATs (PrepTests). Nothing else replicates the logic, structure, or psychological weight quite like the real thing.

Review as Training, Not Just Correction

Too many test-takers treat review like error-spotting. That’s not enough. High-level review is diagnosis.

  • Error logs: Track every mistake—not just the answer, but why you missed it.
  • Timing audits: Identify where you slowed down, rushed, or second-guessed.
  • Behavioral notes: Record emotional patterns—when you panicked, when you guessed, when you lost focus.

These aren’t just academic exercises. They reveal the structural weaknesses in your approach—flaws that won’t fix themselves.

Using LSAT Communities and Tools Wisely

LSAT Reddit, 7Sage forums, Discord groups—they’re useful. But they’re not your study plan. Be selective. Use them for insight, not instruction. The loudest voices often aren’t the most accurate.

Analytics tools (like LSAT Lab, LawHub, and PT trackers) can pinpoint trends, but only you can act on them. And while comparing scores might feel productive, it usually isn’t. You’re not here to win the forum—you’re here to win the test.

Timing the Real Test—and Deciding When to Retake

If you’re targeting fall applications, plan to test no later than August. Earlier is better—June gives you breathing room for a retake, if needed, and lets you polish essays without score anxiety hanging overhead.

Register at least two months in advance. Spots fill fast—especially for in-person centers. Lock in your logistics: quiet test space, backup Wi-Fi, ID ready. Leave nothing to chance.

Should You Retake?

LSAC allows you to take the LSAT three times per testing year, five times in five years, and seven times lifetime. But don’t retake just because you “felt off.” Retake because your diagnostics—and discipline—point to meaningful improvement.

Being “ready” isn’t just about hitting your goal score once. It’s about hitting it consistently, under pressure, with enough buffer to absorb a rough section.

Post-Test Strategy

Law schools see all your scores, but most emphasize the highest. If you improve, great—it shows grit. If you don’t? You’re still in the game.

Don’t explain a low score unless there’s a real reason (illness, technical failure, etc.). Otherwise, silence reads stronger than excuse-making. Your application should focus on what you can control—your best score and your best story.

Final Words—and Your Next Move

Climbing from a 165 to a 173 isn’t just uncommon—it’s elite. But it’s absolutely doable with the right plan, precision, and discipline. We’ve guided applicants through this exact leap—by reshaping their study strategy, refining their execution, and sharpening every section to test-day readiness.

The key is knowing where to focus, when to pivot, and how to push past plateaus. That’s where expert insight makes all the difference.

Ready to make your move? Schedule a free consultation with an MBA Exchange LSAT advisor. You bring the ambition—we’ll help you turn it into results.